About Me

Name: Kyle Singleton
Email: huskyonspeed@hotmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

An Open Letter to George Walker Bush

Dear Mr. President,
As we enter the final hours of your administration, I just wanted to thank you for your service to this great country.  I'm only 21, so it feels like you've been President for most of my life.  I can vaguely remember those cold mornings in December 2000, listening to radio updates with my Dad about your unbelievably close race with then-Vice President Gore.  I really didn't have a firm grasp on politics back then, but I was happy that you finally won.  
Only a few months later, something happened that I will remember for the rest of my life: A group of terrorists hijacked 4 planes, smashing 2 of them into New York trade center buildings and one into the Pentagon.  Thanks to some brave souls, the 4th plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania.  When it was over, nearly 3,000 Americans were dead.  I didn't really know what to think.  I remember there was a lot of fear.  But you reassured the American people.  You told us to go on and resume our lives and not live in fear.  In this last election, you were ridiculed for saying that, but we as a country needed to hear it.  
The aftermath to that terrible day was messy.  We had to fight a new kind of war, not against countries, but against radicals hiding all over the world.  We began in Afghanistan, and later returned to Iraq.  The Taliban and Saddam Hussein had no chance against America's finest.  But instead of leaving those places in disarray, you tried to instill democracy.  Just like after the American Revolution, that took time.  After a while, it became very unpopular back home.  But you stayed the course, doing what you thought was right rather than what was politically expedient.  There are still challenges in the Middle East, but casualties are way down, and both countries now have popularly elected leaders.  
On the domestic side, a lot happened as well.  As is the normal in politics, a leader can't accomplish all the things he sets out to do.  We weren't able to fix social security or find a good solution to healthcare or education, but we did get some good things done.  The "Bush tax cuts" that some people have been ragging on brought tax relief to working families like mine, and helped stimulate the economy after 9/11.  In my opinion, you also appointed two fine young justices to the Supreme Court, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Alito, who will work diligently to protect our constitution and our precious rights.  
I haven't always agreed with your decisions.  I thought government spending was too high, and the failed immigration bill of '07 was not our best option.  I also didn't think we needed the "bailout" last autumn, but our economy was facing unprecedented challenges, and you acted to try to make things better.  I hope that will be the case.  
I also hope that history will be a better judge of your presidency than your critics.  Whatever your flaws, you didn't deserve to be treated the way that some have treated you.  Thank you again for your service, and I hope you and your family have an enjoyable retirement.  God bless.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Exxon Mobil: Some food for thought

You might have heard some screaming from the left about oil company Exxon Mobil's 3rd quarter profit, approximately $15 Billion, and how they are ripping off consumers, or something to that effect.  But let's delve a little deeper.  Exxon does have a large profit, but it is mostly because they are a LARGE COMPANY.  Their profit margin is about 7% (i.e., they make 7 cents profit on every dollar of sales), that is about average.  That $15 Billion represents after-tax income.  At a 35% corporate tax rate, that means they paid $8 Billion in federal income taxes.  Furthermore, the combined state and federal gas tax is, on average, 47 cents a gallon.  So, if gas costs, say, 3 bucks a gallon, the government is making 47 cents a gallon on the gas tax alone, and Exxon Mobil is making 21 cents (7 cents a dollar times 3).  The moral of the story: Exxon Mobil and other oil companies aren't ripping us off, the government is.  The oil industry is already overtaxed, any tax increases (windfall profits tax?) won't make prices go down, they will probably go up.  Also, how can you expect the government to really pursue energy independence, when they can make billions off the oil industry by doing more of the same?  The government has no financial motivation to change anything.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bobby Jindal and Hannity & Colmes...

The more often I hear the young Louisiana Governor speak, the more I like him.  All I really know about him policy-wise is that he fought corruption, but he seems like a good conservative guy.  And I liked his answer about why he's going to Iowa this month: He likes the weather!  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrat Congress + Obama = ?

Conventional thought suggests that the Democrat party will increase their majorities in both houses of congress in this election.  Depending on what polls you look at, they may even approach the 60 seat threshold in the Senate for invoking cloture on filibusters.  The question is: which presidential candidate to we want to work with the Democrat-controlled congress?  Let's take a brief history lesson.  Both the Clinton years and the Reagan years are generally considered to be "good times" with a strong economy.  Both of those presidents accomplished much of their along with the other party: Reagan with Tip O'Neill and a Democrat house, and Clinton with Newt Gingrich and a Republican congress.  In contrast, President Carter and a democrat congress in the 70's isn't remembered quite as fondly.  The point is, America is great not because of the greatness of one political party or the other, but because of the American people.  The 2 parties have shown the ability to work together when the circumstances require it, but it is my view that, in general, no government action is better than too much government action.  
Let's flash back to the present.  John McCain has shown the ability to work with Democrats on legislation (much to my disliking).  I think he has the leadership to work with a democrat congress, check their power when necessary, and work together with them when necessary.  Barack Obama, so far, does not have a record of bipartisanship or leadership, to be frank.  Maybe, as president, he will work with Republicans as well as Democrats on Capitol Hill.  Maybe he won't.  The choice is yours. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dino Rossi for Governor!

I'll admit, I don't follow state-level politics as much as the national scene.  But I had the opportunity to attend a rally for the GOP nominee, Dino Rossi, today, and even shake his hand.  His wife spoke as well and said that he only spends money on "needs" and not "wants".  I think we need more business-minded people like Mr. Rossi in Government!  As President Harding said, "we need less government in business and more business in government." I'm also supporting him because he says he will reverse a ruling by the state pharmacy board that forces pharmacists to dispense "Plan B" pills even if it violates their religious beliefs, which I feel is a terrible ruling by the board.  The mother of 2 of my friends is a pharmacist and is involved in a lawsuit about this ruling.  
I encourage any Washington State residents reading this to remember to vote for Dino!  He lost by only 133 votes last time, every vote is important!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Debunking liberal arguments about gun control (constitution style)

As we know, the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution speaks about gun rights, saying, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."  To most people of common sense, that speaks clearly to individuals being able to own guns without restriction.  But, some of our friends on the left bring up the "well regulated Militia" clause to justify restricting gun rights.  So, what exactly is a militia?  The constitution makes several other references to the militia.  Article 1, section 8, (the powers of congress) grants congress the power to "provide for calling forth the Militia... to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States..." this shows that the militia has something to do with the organized military, but as you will see in section 8, the militia is separated from the army and navy, which congress has more direct control over.  Article 2, section 2 grants the president power of commander in chief of the army, navy, and the "militia of the several states, when called into actual service of the United States." So the militia is a state-based organization, like the national guard? Not exactly.  "No State shall, without the consent of congress... keep troops (article 1, section 10)."  So, the state doesn't have right to run it's own military, outside of congress's approval.  And, in fact, the constitution grants no party the authority to regulate the milita.  The militia was simply considered to be white men eligible to serve their country in combat.  Since then, we have extended equal rights and protection to women and minorities as well, so they are also in the "militia".  So who does get to regulate the militia?  Amendment 10: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."  Clearly, the people!  The second amendment simply says that adults can own guns, without exception.  Don't let anyone convince you otherwise.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »